MORE than 2,500 people responded to the council's survey on the budget savings with many reacting strongly to proposals to close public toilets and cuts to education services.

Around 1,028 engaged online, 71 opted for the printed survey; 1,035 responded as part of a citizens panel; 318 from Third Sector Interface; and 47 from youth services.

In addition, 61 people contributed to focus groups, and numerous emails, letters and petitions were received on all or some of the points raised in the consultation.

These were from individuals, groups, community councils and representatives of organisations and were sent to councillors, senior officers, and the ‘planning our future’ email address.

The council revealed the response is "one of the highest" received to a budget consultation.

In terms of key findings in relation to savings options, the report stated overall respondents agreed/strongly agreed with 91 options, 73 by 50 per cent or more.

They disagreed/strongly disagreed with 54 options, 29 by 50 per cent or more respondents.

The following five options received the highest disapproval rates: close 43 public conveniences (Roads and Amenity Services): 76 per cent; reduce road works/bridge maintenance (Roads and Amenity Services): 70 per cent; remove all crossing patrollers (Roads and Amenity Services): 69 per cent; reduce classroom assistants (primary) (Education): 66 per cent; reduce classroom assistants (secondary), pupil support, school technician costs (Education): 64 per cent.

Of those agreed with, the following five options received the highest approval rates: energy reduction lighting programme (Roads and Amenity Services)– 91 per cent; reduce print and postage costs (creditors, in service points and in revenue and benefits): 87 per cent-92 per cent; apply landlord penalties (Revenue and Benefits): 84 per cent; spend to save water/energy (Facility services): 81 per cent; and remove vacant alternative enforcement post (Planning and Regulatory): 80 per cent.

Increasing council tax received a mixed response, with 51 per cent for and 49 per cent against.

Focus groups revealed respondents were not supportive of cuts in the following main areas: education, or any related service, such as libraries; services that support the wider public, particularly the most vulnerable people; and cuts to frontline staff.

Respondents were also critical of cuts perceived as impacting negatively on attracting people to the area – whether as tourists, to live or work – and therefore on the aims of the Single Outcome Agreement; and they were supportive of council services transforming and becoming more efficient.

In relation to feedback for respondent, in recognition of the time people have spent giving their views, and in response to requests received through previous consultations, feedback will be provided on how views given have contributed to decisions made.

The report stated: "This will be made available in different ways, as soon as possible after the budget-setting meeting of February 11."