Faslane has been the focus of an article by internationally-renowned newspaper, The New York Times, following the SNPs determination to rid Scotland of nuclear weapons.

As the SNP’s popularity surges, more importance is once again being placed on the issue of Trident - and whether Britain can afford to keep its nuclear deterrent.

Michael Curley, owner of the Buffet Shop in Colquhoun Square, was approached by the New York Times to give his views on having the nuclear fleet nearby.

He said that the demise of the nuclear fleet would ‘devastate’ the town.

This week he told the Advertiser about being contacted by The New York Times about his views, and what he thinks could happen for the town in the coming months.

Mr Curley said: “They phoned from London, and said they wanted to come up and get my views on the importance of Faslane and Coulport.

“I’m a bit more controversial – I speak my mind, I try to be as truthful as possible.” In the run up to last September’s Referendum, the world’s media descended on the town after the SNP outlined in their White Paper that nuclear weapons would be removed from the Clyde.

Mr Curley said that he thinks the world’s eyes will be on the people of Helensburgh in the next few months – to gauge how they feel about having nuclear weapons nearby -– not just for the general election, but as the nuclear issue is one of global importance.

He said: “A lot of people have seen the article. A lady sent me a letter about it.

“The reaction is, quite honestly, there will be a lot more interest in Helensburgh.

“If you look at aspects of the area, the US and Europe will be watching with great interest.

“I’m sure Mr Putin among others would be pleased to see the demise of Trident.

“Lots of people are looking on the town with great interest, they will be looking for the reaction of the local people about Trident.

“I’m very much for Faslane and the deterrent being kept.”