ONE of Nicola Sturgeon’s former MPs has insisted that there is “wafer thin” support for Scottish independence in the middle class and the SNP has wasted its energy appealing to “narrow interests”.
George Kerevan, who was the SNP MP for East Lothian between 2015 and 2017 has warned activists that the First Minister’s “political charisma” has drummed up record levels of support for independence and that any shift from the party to the right is snuffed out.
Wiring for the left wing Conter website, Mr Kerevan suggested that “the foundations of middle-class support for independence are wafer thin”.
He added: "It is based solely on the political charisma of 'president' Sturgeon and the SNP leadership’s slavish support for the institutions of the EU.
"This provides the professional, pro-EU Scottish middle class with the necessary assurance that the First Minister will personally protect their narrow interests both from incompetent, Little Englander Boris but also from the anti-austerity, democratic passions of the pro-indy underclass in the housing schemes."
Last month, outspoken SNP MP Kenny Macaskill criticised his party’s leadership for indulging in “political chicanery” instead of preparing for a second indpendence referendum.
READ MORE: SNP MP warns of 'growing despair' in party over lack of planning for Indyref2
He said: “He said: “Underpinning all the discontent has been a growing despair at the failure of SNP HQ to prepare for Indyref2.”
Mr Kerevan warned that even when party veterans “accept the SNP leadership is drifting rightwards, many argue that “now is not the time to ‘rock the boat’ - especially as popular support for independence is running at record levels”.
He added: "But Sturgeon’s softly-softly tactics leave the movement impotent if the British state turns nasty – which it will.
"Worse, the sort of independent Scotland the present SNP leadership is leading us toward will only enshrine the rule of the complacent Scottish middle class and rapacious foreign multinationals, to the detriment of the working people.
"We face a choice between defeat or a new form of servitude."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel